Economic Justice
From the Writings and Utterances of `Abdu'l-Baha:
One of the most important principles of the Teaching of Baha'u'llah is:
The right of every human being to the daily
bread whereby they exist, or the equalization of the means of
livelihood.
The arrangements of the circumstances of the
people must be such that poverty shall disappear, that everyone, as far
as possible, according to his rank and position, shall share in comfort
and well-being.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Paris Talks, p. 151)
The fundamentals of the whole economic condition are divine in nature
and are associated with the world of the heart and spirit. This
is fully explained in the Baha'i teaching, and without knowledge of its
principles no improvement in the economic state can be realized.
The Baha'is will bring about this improvement and betterment but not
through sedition and appeal to physical force - not through warfare,
but welfare. Hearts must be so cemented together, love must
become so dominant that the rich shall most willingly extend assistance
to the poor and take steps to establish these economic adjustments
permanently. If it is accomplished in this way, it will be most
praiseworthy because then it will be for the sake of God and in the
pathway of His service. For example, it will be as if the rich
inhabitants of a city should say, "It is neither just nor lawful that
we should possess great wealth while there is abject poverty in this
community," and then willingly give their wealth to the poor, retaining
only as much as will enable them to live comfortably.
Strive, therefore, to create love in the
hearts in order that they may become glowing and radiant. When
that love is shining, it will permeate other hearts even as this
electric light illumines its surroundings. When the love of God is
established, everything else will be realized. This is the true
foundation of all economics.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Promulgation of Universal Peace, pp. 238-239)
To state the matter briefly, the Teachings of Baha'u'llah advocate
voluntary sharing, and this is a greater thing than the equalization of
wealth. For equalization must be imposed from without, while
sharing is a matter of free choice.
Man reacheth perfection through good deeds,
voluntarily performed, not through good deeds the doing of which was
forced upon him. And sharing is a personally chosen righteous
act: that is, the rich should extend assistance to the poor, they
should expend their substance for the poor, but of their own free will,
and not because the poor have gained this end by force. For the
harvest of force is turmoil and the ruin of the social order. On
the other hand voluntary sharing, the freely-chosen expending of one's
substance, leadeth to society's comfort and peace. It lighteth up
the world; it bestoweth honour upon humankind.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Selections ... `Abdu'l-Baha, p. 115)
The fourth principle or teaching of Baha'u'llah is the readjustment and
equalization of the economic standards of mankind. This deals
with the question of human livelihood. It is evident that under
present systems and conditions of government the poor are subject to
the greatest need and distress while others more fortunate live in
luxury and plenty far beyond their actual necessities. This
inequality of portion and privilege is one of the deep and vital
problems of human society. That there is need of an equalization
and apportionment by which all may possess the comforts and privileges
of life is evident. The remedy must be legislative readjustment
of conditions. The rich too must be merciful to the poor,
contributing from willing hearts to their needs without being forced or
compelled to do so. The composure of the world will be assured by
the establishment of this principle in the religious life of mankind.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 107)
Under this adjustment there can be no extremes in human conditions as
regards wealth and sustenance. For the community needs financier,
farmer, merchant and laborer just as an army must be composed of
commander, officers and privates. All cannot be commanders; all
cannot be officers or privates. Each in his station in the social
fabric must be competent - each in his function according to ability
but with justness of opportunity for all.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 216)
It is, therefore, preferable for moderation to be established by means
of laws and regulations to hinder the constitution of the excessive
fortunes of certain individuals, and to protect the essential needs of
the masses. For instance, the manufacturers and the
industrialists heap up a treasure each day, and the poor artisans do
not gain their daily sustenance: that is the height of iniquity,
and no just man can accept it. Therefore, laws and regulations
should be established which would permit the workmen to receive from
the factory owner their wages and a share in the fourth or the fifth
part of the profits, according to the capacity of the factory; or in
some other way the body of workmen and the manufacturers should share
equitably the profits and advantages. Indeed, the capital and
management come from the owner of the factory, and the work and labor,
from the body of the workmen. Either the workmen should receive
wages which assure them an adequate support and, when they cease work,
becoming feeble or helpless, they should have sufficient benefits from
the income of the industry; or the wages should be high enough to
satisfy the workmen with the amount they receive so that they may
themselves be able to put a little aside for days of want and
helplessness.
When matters will be thus fixed, the owner of
the factory will no longer put aside daily a treasure which he has
absolutely no need of (for, if the fortune is disproportionate, the
capitalist succumbs under a formidable burden and gets into the
greatest difficulties and troubles; the administration of an excessive
fortune is very difficult and exhausts man's natural strength).
And the workmen and artisans will no longer be in the greatest misery
and want; they will no longer be submitted to the worst privations at
the end of their life.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Some Answered Questions, pp. 274-275)
It should not be imagined that the writer's earlier remarks constitute
a denunciation of wealth or a commendation of poverty. Wealth is
praiseworthy in the highest degree, if it is acquired by an
individual's own efforts and the grace of God, in commerce,
agriculture, art and industry, and if it be expended for philanthropic
purposes. Above all, if a judicious and resourceful individual
should initiate measures which would universally enrich the masses of
the people, there could be no undertaking greater than this, and it
would rank in the sight of God as the supreme achievement, for such a
benefactor would supply the needs and insure the comfort and well-being
of a great multitude. Wealth is most commendable, provided the
entire population is wealthy. If, however, a few have inordinate
riches while the rest are impoverished, and no fruit or benefit accrues
from that wealth, then it is only a liability to its possessor.
If, on the other hand, it is expended for the promotion of knowledge,
the founding of elementary and other schools, the encouragement of art
and industry, the training of orphans and the poor - in brief, if it is
dedicated to the welfare of society - its possessor will stand out
before God and man as the most excellent of all who live on earth and
will be accounted as one of the people of paradise.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Secret of Divine Civilization, pp. 24-25)
Among the results of the manifestation of spiritual forces will be that
the human world will adapt itself to a new social form, the justice of
God will become manifest throughout human affairs, and human equality
will be universally established. The poor will receive a great
bestowal, and the rich attain eternal happiness. For although at
the present time the rich enjoy the greatest luxury and comfort, they
are nevertheless deprived of eternal happiness; for eternal happiness
is contingent upon giving, and the poor are everywhere in the state of
abject need. Through the manifestation of God's great equity the
poor of the world will be rewarded and assisted fully, and there will
be a readjustment in the economic conditions of mankind so that in the
future there will not be the abnormally rich nor the abject poor.
The rich will enjoy the privilege of this new economic condition as
well as the poor, for owing to certain provisions and restrictions they
will not be able to accumulate so much as to be burdened by its
management, while the poor will be relieved from the stress of want and
misery. The rich will enjoy his palace, and the poor will have
his comfortable cottage.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 132)
Among them are (the teachings) concerning the question of economics
that all the members of the body politic may enjoy through the working
out of this solution the greatest happiness, welfare and comfort
without any harm or injury attacking the general order of things.
Thereby no difference or dissension will occur. No sedition or
contention will take place. This solution is this:
First and foremost is the principle that to
all the members of the body politic shall be given the greatest
achievements of the world of humanity. Each one shall have the
utmost welfare and well-being. To solve this problem we must begin with
the farmer; there will we lay a foundation for system and order because
the peasant class and the agricultural class exceed other classes in
the importance of their service. In every village there must be
established a general storehouse which will have a number of revenues.
The first revenue will be that of the tenth or tithes.
The second revenue (will be derived) from the animals.
The third revenue, from the minerals, that is
to say, every mine prospected or discovered, a third thereof will go to
this vast storehouse.
The fourth is this: whosoever dies
without leaving any heirs all his heritage will go to the general
storehouse.
Fifth, if any treasures shall be found on the land they should be devoted to this storehouse.
All these revenues will be assembled in this storehouse.
As to the first, the tenths or tithes:
we will consider a farmer, one of the peasants. We will look into
his income. We will find out, for instance, what is his annual
revenue and also what are his expenditures. Now, if his income be equal
to his expenditures, from such a farmer nothing whatever will be
taken. That is, he will not be subjected to taxation of any sort,
needing as he does all his income. Another farmer may have
expenses running up to one thousand dollars we will say, and his income
is two thousand dollars. From such an one a tenth will be
required, because he has a surplus. But if his income be ten
thousand dollars and his expenses one thousand dollars or his income
twenty thousand dollars, he will have to pay as taxes,
one-fourth. If his income be one hundred thousand dollars and his
expenses five thousand, one-third will he have to pay because he has
still a surplus since his expenses are five thousand and his income one
hundred thousand. If he pays, say, thirty-five thousand dollars,
in addition to the expenditure of five thousand he still has sixty
thousand left. But if his expenses be ten thousand and his income two
hundred thousand then he must give an even half because ninety thousand
will be in that case the sum remaining. Such a scale as this will
determine allotment of taxes. All the income from such revenues
will go to this general storehouse.
Then there must be considered such emergencies
as follows: a certain farmer whose expenses run up to ten
thousand dollars and whose income is only five thousand, he will
receive necessary expenses from the storehouse. Five thousand
dollars will be allotted to him so he will not be in need.
Then the orphans will be looked after, all of
whose expenses will be taken care of. The cripples in the village
- all their expenses will be looked after. The poor in the
village - their necessary expenses will be defrayed. And other
members who for valid reasons are incapacitated - the blind, the
old, the deaf - their comfort must be looked after. In the
village no one will remain in need or in want. All will live in
the utmost comfort and welfare. Yet no schism will assail the
general order of the body politic.
Hence the expenses or expenditures of the
general storehouse are now made clear and its activities made
manifest. The income of this general storehouse has been
shown. Certain trustees will be elected by the people in a given
village to look after these transactions. The farmers will be
taken care of and if after all these expenses are defrayed any surplus
is found in the storehouse it must be transferred to the national
treasury.
This system is all thus ordered so that in the
village the very poor will be comfortable, the orphans will live
happily and well; in a word, no one will be left destitute. All
the individual members of the body politic will thus live comfortably
and well.
For larger cities, naturally, there will be a
system on a larger scale. Were I to go into that solution the
details thereof would be very lengthy.
The result of this (system) will be that each
individual member of the body politic will live most comfortably and
happily under obligation to no one. Nevertheless, there will be
preservation of degree because in the world of humanity there must
needs be degrees. The body politic may well be likened to an
army. In this army there must be a general, there must be a
sergeant, there must be a marshal, there must be the infantry; but all
must enjoy the greatest comfort and welfare.
God is not partial and is no respecter of
persons. He has made provision for all. The harvest comes
forth for everyone. The rain showers upon everybody and the heat
of the sun is destined to warm everyone. The verdure of the earth
is for everyone. Therefore there should be for all humanity the
utmost happiness, the utmost comfort, the utmost well-being.
But if conditions are such that some are happy
and comfortable and some in misery; some are accumulating exorbitant
wealth and others are in dire want - under such a system it is
impossible for man to be happy and impossible for him to win the good
pleasure of God. God is kind to all. The good pleasure of God
consists in the welfare of all the individual members of mankind.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Foundations of World Unity, pp. 39-41)
Each person in the community whose need is equal to his individual
producing capacity shall be exempt from taxation. But if his
income is greater than his needs, he must pay a tax until an adjustment
is effected. That is to say, a man's capacity for production and
his needs will be equalized and reconciled through taxation. If
his production exceeds, he will pay a tax; if his necessities exceed
his production, he shall receive an amount sufficient to equalize or
adjust. Therefore, taxation will be proportionate to capacity and
production, and there will be no poor in the community.
(`Abdu'l-Baha: Promulgation of Universal Peace, p. 217)
From the Writings of Shoghi Effendi:
Social inequality is the inevitable outcome of the natural inequality
of man. Human beings are different in ability and should,
therefore, be different in their social and economic standing.
Extremes of wealth and poverty should, however, be abolished...
The Master has definitely stated that wages
should be unequal, simply because that men are unequal in their ability
and hence should receive wages that would correspond to their varying
capacities and resources.
(Shoghi Effendi: Directives of the Guardian, p. 20)
From Letters Written on Behalf of Shoghi Effendi:
With regard to your question concerning the Baha'i attitude towards
labour problems; these cannot assuredly be solved, Abdu'l-Baha tells
us, through the sheer force of physical violence. Non-cooperation
too, even though not accompanied by acts of violence, is
ineffective. The conflict between labour and capital can best be
solved through the peaceful and constructive methods of cooperation and
of consultation.
(Shoghi Effendi, quoted by the Universal House of Justice: Lights of Guidance, pp. 427-428)
From the Writings of the Universal House of Justice:
The inordinate disparity between rich and poor, a source of acute
suffering, keeps the world in a state of instability, virtually on the
brink of war. Few societies have dealt effectively with this
situation. The solution calls for the combined application of
spiritual, moral and practical approaches.
(The Universal House of Justice: Lights of Guidance, p. 552)
@Copyright
Bahá’ís
of Dana Point, California, USA - all rights reserved.